… check the scale Sherri Shepherd

August 24th, 2009 by Alexandra

So… this will be simple. Sherri – it’s fantastic you lost 41 pounds. That’s no small feat, but you’re not hot. There’s much work to be done and even then you won’t be hot. It just isn’t happening. If a killer whale is 7000 pounds and loses 150, it’s a step in the right direction, but come on – it’s still a fat ass killer whale you know? And just because that Lane Bryant, relaxed fit pant reads “Size 6″ doesn’t make it a reality.

… get a date with me now, because this may be it

August 23rd, 2009 by Alexandra

This may be the thing that officially pushes me to the other team…

From wwtdd.com and celebuzz.com

Good news, movie buffs! Script Shadow has reviewed the script for the upcoming Natalie Portman/Mila Kunis project Black Swan, and from the sound of things it’s going to be plenty kinky.

“Can I just tell you why none of my review matters? Can I just tell you why my review is absolutely pointless? Because in this movie, Natalie Portman and Mila Kunis have sex,” the review reads. “Yeah. You read that right. And not just nice sweet innocent sex either. We’re talking ecstasy-induced hungry aggressive angry sex. Yeah so…this movie is already on the must-see list of 2010.”

Let me just take a moment. I’m (technically) hetero. I only need glance at Jeremy Shockey or David Beckham to prove that. However, Kunis and Portman are the type of chicks that other chicks think “Yeah, if I were ever going to go there… I’d go there with them. We’d have a few appletinis, complain about the quirks of men and how much trouble they are, giggle, act playful, begin a pillow fight and one thing just kinda naturally leads to another. ”

I mean I assume that’s what other chicks think…

… check out the “Seeking BBW” posts on Craigslist Kelly Clarkson

August 8th, 2009 by Alexandra

From Popeater.com

Clarkson comparison

We’re not pointing any fingers at Kelly Clarkson, but we were surprised when we saw September’s issue of SELF. The fitness magazine shows Clarkson slim and trim, even though recent photos of her show a completely different figure.

SELF’s Editor-in-Chief Lucy Danziger told ETonline.com that “of course” they touch up photos to make needed “corrections” before publishing.

“SELF magazine inspires and informs our 6 million readers each month to reach their all around best,” Danziger said. “Kelly Clarkson exudes confidence, and is a great role model for women of all sizes and stages of their life. She works out and is strong and healthy, and our picture shows her confidence and beauty. She literally glows from within. That is the feeling we’d all want to have. We love this cover and we love Kelly Clarkson.”

(sigh)
Where to even begin.

Kelly Clarkson isn’t outright fat, but she clearly isn’t thin. Her weight yo-yos and frankly that’s something that millions of women can identify with. Why not allow her to be open and honest about her own struggle? Let her appear on the cover as she really is – how she actually looks and let her defend it or simply be proud of it. For a magazine designed to instill confidence and encourage a healthy lifestyle, this does nothing but continue to perpetuate a a false ideal. Young women chase a perfect likeness that doesn’t exist on this mortal plane. If the plump singer believes an ounce of what she claims, she will come out and denounce this nonsense.